Saturday, October 31, 2009

What do you think about NiFongs license being revoked over the outrage in the courthouse?


Answers:
If that's all that happens to him, he can count himself very lucky.
The man needs to be disbarred.
He got just what he deserved, ruining those boys name because he was trying to get elected again and used them as his campaign, now, he is crying, he is only crying cause hr got caught. I just hope he can never get his license back, but who hire him if he did, not me. I think he is a little goofy and a slight retardation of the brain.
I am in complete agreement with the Ethics panel that chose to disbar Mr Nifong; what he did was WRONG and the worst is that three innocent young gentlemen (and their families) suffered for the longest time before justice prevailed.

I not only think that Mr Nifong should be disbarred but I also think every attorney that helped him along during this case should be disbarred as well.

I also have an issue with the alleged victim of the attack. She said those three guys did it but then later changed her story. She helped to drag those three thru you know what and back.

I think those three young men (and their families) should consider suing Mr Nifong and a few other people.
its an outrage i think what justice does that do for people innocent and in jail now . i dunno i guess that weren't white and didn't have money, ya know its funny that no one called for Marsha Clark's license's hell OJ is still feeling the crap. i just hate America is the place for white and privileged i think its a sad day, a mans lively hood is taken because he thought that he was serving his community . and only reason anybody cares is because they were privileged. if that would have happened to anyone else,we would have never known and that's sad.
There are significant differences between the case in North Carolina and the O.J. Simpson matter. Ms. Clark's conduct was probably incompetent, but it wasn't grossly unethical. Mr. Simpson was found not-guilty, not because he didn't do it, but because a bungled investigation and prosecution made it impossible to prove BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT that he did it. Note that in Mr. Simpson's case, a civil jury later found him liable for the offense.

Mr. NiFong's actions brought disgrace upon himself and upon the entire legal profession, in that he violated many of the core principles that lawyers are taught and pledge to uphold. Disbarment is the appropriate sanction.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 


What do I do © 2008. Design by: Pocket Web Hosting

vc .net