Tuesday, May 25, 2010

What does admissable in court mean on a lie detector test?

O.k. here is my whole story, my daughter accused her father of molesting her a year ago today, and now he has to go to trail to prove he did not do it. They have no evidence on him, but his attorney states that the courts believe the child 51% over the parent, what outcome would he have of proving his self not guilty?
Answers:
it means the results of the test can be used against you
51% is not a good thing. admissionable means that the lie detector test will be entered as evidence in the trial. If I was your husband I'd flee the country right after I read this reply because I'm going doing some serious Jail time with some
not so friendly people.
If the man has a competent lawyer, he should have a good chance of proving his innocence. However - lie detector results are generally inadmissible in court, as they are seriously unreliable -in other words, lie detectors cannot be depended upon to detect lies - or prove that lying is not occurring either!
admissable in court is that they can use it in a court of law. Lie detectors are not usaly accepted but the state will slip it in the judge will tell the jury to dismiss what the state said about the test then its to late it is in the jury and judges mind the findings of the test
Sounds like they are saying that the lie detector test results can be used in court in order to come up with a verdict.
Answer to the second Question would be 49%.
Sorry, but that means lie detector tests will be accepted.

If they have no evidence against him except the lie detector test, which says he did it, they most likely won't find him guilty. However, if there is other evidence, they can use the polygraph as a deciding factor.

Good luck to him, and for his sake he better hope he didn't do it, because I will be the one chasing him.
As I said, a polygraph test can be addmitted into evidence for impeachment purposes. That means, that whomever takes the test and fails, then testifies under oath and lies, the results could be used to show that the person is not truthful.

In cases like this, a child's testimony is not enough to convict. There will also be a psychologist assigned to the child and THAT along with family services, will determine the veracity of the charges.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 


What do I do © 2008. Design by: Pocket Web Hosting

vc .net